Will Arizona voters remove judicial term limits, retention elections with Proposition 137?
But those votes could be moot if Arizonans also approve Proposition 137. The ballot measure overhauls the current system of electing judges and is retroactive, meaning Bolick and King could remain on the bench even if they are individually voted off.
Arizona Proposition 137 Election Results: End Term Limits for Judges
This proposition would amend the state Constitution so that voters would no longer have the ability to choose whether to retain a judge. This would apply to the Arizona Supreme Court and Court of Appeals, and judges of the Superior Court in counties with a population greater than 250,000.
Arizona voters decide whether to keep Supreme Court justices Clint Bolick and Kathryn King, who were scorned over near-total ...
Prop. 137 goes against several things mom valued most,” said Scott O'Connor of his mother, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra ...
The 2024 judicial retention elections, and all retention elections thereafter, will stay intact given the sweeping failure of ...
With 73% of Arizona precincts reporting, Prop. 137 will not be voted into law with only 21.61% of voters having voted in ...
Arizona Republic on MSN5h
What AZ propositions passed? Here's what to know about abortion measure, moreArizona voters were faced with many ballot initiatives on Election Day. Here's where each proposition stands, including the ...
FOX 10 Phoenix on MSN18h
Arizona voters reject Props 136, 137, and 138: AP projectionThree ballot measures in Arizona are projected by the Associated Press to fail. The measures deal with judicial term limits, ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback