The battle over birthright citizenship is just getting started.   Challengers to President Trump’s executive order view ...

The Supreme Court did not rule last week on whether President Trump's executive order ending birthright citizenship was constitutional. But the court did pave the way for that order to take effect in ...

In a June 27 ruling, the Supreme Court granted the Trump administration’s request to partially halt nationwide injunctions ...

A Supreme Court ruling on national injunctions may change how U.S.-born newborns receive Social Security numbers, affecting ...

The ruling left unsettled the question of whether children born to immigrants without full legal status in the United States ...

The Supreme Court delivered a major win to the Trump administration, allowing it for now to move forward with its plan to end ...

Within two hours of a Supreme Court ruling that limits the ability of federal courts to impose universal injunctions, lawyers ...

Thirty years later, Wong Kim Ark, a man born in the U.S. to Chinese parents, was refused re-entry into the U.S. after ...

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday issued a major decision scaling back the power of federal judges to block presidential ...

“So, universal birthright citizenship isn’t required by the 14th Amendment’s text or historical context. It’s inconsistent with the earliest legal interpretations of the amendment.

The archbishop of Miami writes that an executive order seeking to overturn birthright citizenship, established by the 14th Amendment and solidified as pertaining to children born in this country ...

Trump may think that birthright citizenship is only "about the babies of slaves." But as these statements from the 1866 debates make clear, the historical evidence proves him wrong.