So, free to go, and all even on the card? Not quite. It is indeed far and away the most important thing that Sam Kerr has been found not guilty. But the judge was not done. Credit: Matt Golding ...

On Tuesday, Sam Kerr was found not guilty of racially aggravated harassment of a police officer, bringing to an end a two-year-long saga. However, for Kerr and for Australian football, there are ...

I was reminded of this episode, and what it said about the ability of certain sporting celebrities to claim victimhood despite inexcusable conduct, by the trial of Sam Kerr. Until last week’s ...

TV star Georgie Tunny believes Sam Kerr's position as Matildas captain is no longer 'tenable'. The broadcaster also revealed why she thinks Football Australia's statement following the conclusion ...

Australian footballer Sam Kerr and partner Kristie Mewis arrive ... The lawyer said he wouldn’t go as far as calling Kerr a “card-carrying racist” but asked the jury to consider a “hypothe ...

This week, it’s another trial: this one over Australia captain Sam Kerr calling a police officer ... s DMs means to a judge on my 2025 bingo card? Absolutely not. It’s hard to keep laughing ...

The jury at Kingston upon Thames Crown Court in London took four hours to consider its verdict before acquitting Kerr, the AAP said, adding Kerr did not react when the verdict was read out but ...

Sam Kerr, one of the world’s top female soccer players, was found not guilty Tuesday of racially aggravated harassment of a police officer. Kerr, a striker for Australia and for English club ...

London: At face value, it seemed relatively cut and dry. No matter how many viewed it as trivial, Sam Kerr had been captured on camera saying what she said, and she couldn’t dispute it.

Sam certainly has Australia ... it is that the deployment of the “white privilege” card should no longer be a free pass to absolution, or a convenient defence for footballers behaving reprehensibly.